From Emil Bock (c 1954):
Owing to the lead he had gained over humanity through his destiny, Paul was a fundamental prophecy become living fact. The truth he uttered in the present was at this same time an unveiling of the future. Therefore, all genuine Christian experience would be of a prophetic nature from now on. To be a Christian signified to develop future states of human existence and consciousness ahead of time. This was why it was Paul’s fervent concern that the prophetic gift by cultivated first and foremost of the special talents blossoming in the congregations under the powerful presence of the Spirit. This gift contained no vestiges of ancient, ecstatic mediumship; it was of a purely future nature. It awakened in those persons who enkindled the spark of Damascus, who experienced the indwelling of the Christ-ego in their human ego and were thus transported into a future state of humanity’s evolution. If they succeeded in awakening in themselves the future condition of humanity they could view the present from the perspectives of the future and were able to decipher “the signs of the times.” The gift of prophecy, recommended so emphatically by Paul as something to be cultivated, was an apocalyptic talent that proceeded not from a diminution but from an intensification of awakened consciousness.
Emil Bock, Saint Paul: Life, Epistles and Teaching (Edinburgh: Floris Books, 1993; translation by Maria St. Goar), p. 309; (originally published 1954 in German as Paulus.)
From Andrei Tarkovsky (c 1986) and Alexander Pushkin (1846)
There can be no question of a person‘s remaining passive once he has grasped truths of that order, for they come to him without his willing it, and they overturn all his earlier ideas about how the world is. In a very real sense he is an instrument, a medium, obliged to live and to act for the sake of other people.
Thus Alexander Pushkin considered that every poet, every true artist (and I have always seen myself as a poet rather than a cinematographer)—regardless of whether he wants to be or not—is a prophet. Pushkin saw the capacity to look into time and predict the future as a terrible gift, and his allotted role caused him untold torment…..I feel that the pen which wrote these lines in 1846 was not held by Alexander Pushkin alone:
Weary from hunger of spirit
Through the grim waste land I dragged my way,
And a six-winged seraph came to me
At a place where two paths crossed.
With finger-tips as light as sleep
He touched the pupils of my eyes,
And my mantic pupils opened
Like eyes of an eagle scared.
As his fingers touched my ears
They were filled with roar and clang:
And I heard the shuddering of the sky,
And angels’s mountain flight,
And sea beasts moving in the deep,
And growth of valley vine.
And he pressed against my mouth,
And out he plucked my sinful tongue,
And all its guile and empty words,
And taking a wise serpent’s tongue
He thrust it in my frozen mouth
With his incardine right hand.
And with his sword he cleft my breast,
And out he plucked my trembling heart,
And in my gaping breast he placed
A coal alive with flames.
Like a corpse I lay in the waste land,
And I heard God’s voice cry out:
“Arise, prophet, and see and hear,
Be charged with my will—
And go out over seas and lands
To fire men's hearts with the word. “
Andrei Tarkovsky, Sculpting in Time : Reflections on the Cinema (translated from the Russian by Kitty Hunter-Blair; New York, Knopf, 1987) pp 220-222.